Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Transition of Care MU CQR TOC check box defaults defect CISDB00059452

Bugs, Known Issues, Open Cases

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

1 Posts

1 Users

0 Reactions

64 Views

RSS

dduschel

(@dduschel)

Posts: 207

Reputable Member

Topic starter

FYI in case anyone else is experiencing this. The individual Referral Order Default does not work. It is only the category Default. For example if your category is set to not auto check the TOC box but you have an individual referral order in that category checked to be a TOC it will not be checked. vise verse is true as well. Our numbers a bad and when trying to trouble shoot this I noticed that this had changed from when we intially set it up. We are currently on CEMR DB 9.8.11_3 The orders were initially set up and tested prior to SP 11 so I guess that is when it went wrong. Here is GE's response

Dawn,

You’re welcome to. I don’t know why anyone would disagree with sharing workarounds to issues. There’s also the possibility that someone has come up with a better solution than the one I offered. That is just one that I have heard of from users.

This should be made public knowledge as it has greatly affected our CQR reporting to date for 2016 and it has taken us a long time to track this down. So I will need to move those to their own category. Should I post this to CHUG to alert other users?

Hi Dawn,

This is XXX from GE Healthcare and I am emailing you to follow up on SR# 1-904735016 (Transition of Care checkbox in category).

It has been determined that the issue reported on this case is caused by a defect in the application. A notification will be sent via listserv when new revisions are available. Each revision includes a list of corrected defects in addition to new features and functionality. At that time, please review the associated release notes to determine the revision corrects the issue reported.

For your records, the SPR number for this issue is: CISDB00059452

In the meantime, the workaround for the issue is: I’ve seen where customers have set up two categories, one for Transitions of Care and another for orders that are not TOCs.

This support case will be archived, however, please be assured the issue reported remains open and has been escalated to product engineering.
Thank you for your patience and for notifying us of this condition.

Posted : May 27, 2016 4:38 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
1 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0