Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Unassigned lab results

Bugs, Known Issues, Open Cases

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

4 Posts

3 Users

0 Reactions

81 Views

RSS

mthompso

(@mthompso)

Posts: 54

Trusted Member

Topic starter

Has anyone else seen an issue where lab results that don't map in LinkLogic appear to be getting mapped to an unrelated observation in the Clinical list changes?

I believe that these used to use a standard notation (? "GE-UNKNOWN") when you looked at the clinical list changes. However, it now appears that if they appear at the top of the list of clinical list changes they show up with no observation listed. If they are further down in the clinical list changes they appear to just keep the name from the last valid observation term match that was found. I looked at the flowsheet and I don't think the information is actually going to that observation term. This can be very confusing when looking at clinical list changes for lab results...

Posted : March 4, 2019 2:43 pm

SLHV

(@slhv)

Posts: 478

Honorable Member

I've never noticed this before. I also can't run a report on obs term "ZZ-GE-unk." I did a quick spot check. It looks like our system is working as expected. We're on CPS 12.0.12.2500 (whichever service pack that is).

[caption id="attachment_198711" align="alignnone" width="617"] lab result contributors list zz-ge-unk obs term.[/caption]

-dp

Posted : March 15, 2019 2:45 am

shayes

(@shayes)

Posts: 4

Active Member

Is this the issue you are seeing @mthompso

Posted : February 5, 2020 6:33 am

mthompso

(@mthompso)

Posts: 54

Trusted Member

Topic starter

Yes. However, at one point I believe that some values actually appeared as if they were going to the wrong observation term. For example, if the 4th value mapped properly and the 5th value didn't have a mapping the fifth value would be listed as going to the same observation as the 4th value. I believe that at some point this was fixed so that now all values that don't have a mapping will show up as going to an empty observation term. This is slightly better as it is less confusing when you are trying to see what value is being mapped to observations.

In the example you provided, it appears that all of the values without mapping are listed at he beginning.

Posted : February 9, 2020 3:55 pm

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0