Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Are there any CHUG users testing the UPT Version of CEMR 9.10 in NY?

CPS, C-EMR, PM

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

3 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

62 Views

RSS

mjharunk

(@mjharunk)

Posts: 191

Reputable Member

Topic starter

Our organization is trying to collect information about the specifics of EPCS with 9.10.

GE hasn't been able to tell us how identity management will be controlled, what kind of costs will be associated with hardware purchases (Imprivata?), what ancillary applications will have to be upgraded, what server/JBOSS requirements will be impacted, etc.

Are there any users that are participating in the UPT testing in NY State? If so, what's the verdict?

Any and all information would be welcome.

Posted : April 6, 2016 9:25 am

pdangelo

(@pdangelo)

Posts: 140

Estimable Member

Our VAR implemented a different solution - VirtualScript. The pricing they gave us for the GE product was ridiculous, and waiting until the last minute has left both us and our VAR in a bad position. This was a known mandate - not a surprise. We should have had the tools necessary to take care of our patients without our EMR being a hindrance. Even the implementation of VirtualScript, because it was last minute before the deadline, has not been smooth. They are still working to iron out bugs.

No matter what, you should look at all options that are available to you. Maybe there is another option that has been tried elsewhere that will be more cost effective for you. Hopefully, someone else will have worked out bugs before you have to implement it. Good luck!

Posted : April 6, 2016 9:54 am

mjharunk

(@mjharunk)

Posts: 191

Reputable Member

Topic starter

Thank you for the response. It sounds like you were able to extract a lot more information from GE than us.

Could you tell me a little more about GE's proposed solution? We don't know what the identity verification system is, what kind of ancillary hardware has to be purchased, what kind of upgrades have to be made to the eSm module, what kind of cost we would incur, etc...

Any specifics would be a big help as we plan our strategy. Wish we could receive this info directly from GE, but...

Posted : April 7, 2016 4:02 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
1 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0