Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Server Configurator and multiple sites, observations and question

CPS, C-EMR, PM

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

2 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

60 Views

RSS

SLHV

(@slhv)

Posts: 478

Honorable Member

Topic starter

We have used the server configurator (SC from now on) to install 2 sites to our test environment on the same 'single server' jboss server.

From what I can tell there is no indication of what sites are installed from SC.

I also see no way to give a different website URL like we could in the past, SC forces you to use the db name as the website url.

SC also will not let you install unless you meet the requirements, so in our test environment I had to give my server 16G of ram and 6 cores just to get the install to move forward.

The requirements for the JBOSS server seem to have jumped dramatically, 5 sites is 21G of ram and 12 cores.

Has anyone else encountered these issues and have you found any solutions?

I honestly don't like the trend of GE forcing me to do anything (ram, cores, etc) seems like a bad indicator of what is to come.

Posted : September 4, 2015 8:22 am

Marketing Committee

(@marketing_committee)

Posts: 358

Reputable Member

SLHV, I've heard that from another user where it wouldn't let them move forward but from my understanding its just supposed to WARN you that you don't meet the recommendations and move forward. My test system VM is far below what is needed on purpose and it gives me a warning but still moves forward. Can you contact GE and see what they say. Please keep me posted.

Posted : September 4, 2015 11:53 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0