Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

What is your organization hearing about v20?

CPS, C-EMR, PM

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

3 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

59 Views

RSS

mjharunk

(@mjharunk)

Posts: 191

Reputable Member

Topic starter

Thought it might be a good idea to create a post eliciting responses from the community on what they're hearing about v20 and the development timeline. Athena is ramping up the official communication with weekly briefings, but we all hear things from other sources too.

Our site is currently running CEMR 9.12.3 and have not implemented an EPCS solution.

Have at it.

Posted : January 14, 2020 4:00 am

petemarkey

(@petemarkey)

Posts: 373

Honorable Member

We have yet to implement EPCS either due to cost; it really should just come with the product as it is pretty much basic functionality for an EMR. I asked our "success manager" what will v20 mean to those that have already paid to implement the current EPCS solution vs. those that have not, and they did not have an answer.

Posted : January 14, 2020 5:08 am

mjharunk

(@mjharunk)

Posts: 191

Reputable Member

Topic starter

We've been told that providers will not have to go through identity proofing again, but the sunk costs for implementation on the current solution (Digicert/Imprivata/Surescripts) would be lost. They haven't stated what the annual cost of the Dr. First solution is per provider.

We're more concerned about the litany of changes proposed in v20. Medication/Prescribing module, immunization management, chart summary, orders module, etc. and the aggressive timeline. It doesn't leave much time for testing/validation, documentation creation, and training.

Posted : January 14, 2020 6:27 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
3 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0