Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Data Mapping for FH Snomed in administration?

General Discussion

Last Post by mbellis 10 years ago

6 Posts

3 Users

0 Reactions

56 Views

RSS

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

Maybe I missed something somewhere, but did everyone else do the data mapping in administration for all the FH observations or did you just do it in the forms? It was just discovered that this existed by my co-worker and now I am trying to figure out if I was supposed to do this as well as the form or just one or the other.....

I feel constantly confused with version 12..... Cry Yell

Thanks for any feedback!

Posted : June 24, 2014 11:18 pm

Jim Poulos

(@jpoulos)

Posts: 118

Estimable Member

We went through each and every CCCQE-User-Edit-FH-<specialty>-TFE.txt file and updated the SNOMED codes to make this form work. Then we decided to put the CPS11 FH-SH form back in place because the users were screaming at how difficult the CPS12 form was to use. So, as it sits today, we are using the old form with SNOMED-edited text files in place.

Posted : June 25, 2014 4:45 am

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

Wait, you were able to use the CPS 11 CCC file and add the snomed codes to that? I also thought that the MU2 report looked for the first degree relationship? The CPS 12 FH form is awful, and the worst workflow ever!!

Posted : June 25, 2014 4:51 am

sborchardt

(@sborchardt)

Posts: 218

Reputable Member

The measure does state - data entry for one or more first degree relatives.

I would be interested in the data mapping if anyone has information.

Steph B.

Posted : June 25, 2014 5:39 am

Jim Poulos

(@jpoulos)

Posts: 118

Estimable Member

As part of the CPS12 upgrade, the CCC text file for Family Medicine (Adult) got updated. I took the changes occurred in this file and transferred them to the other specialty specific FH-SH files. We did this as stop gap to get our providers to stop screaming. We will put the CPS12 FH-SH form back in place very soon because the MU criteria does state - for 1 or more first degree relatives.

Posted : June 25, 2014 6:04 am

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

The data mapping I am referring to is in the administration module, under codes-settings-data mapping. If you go under the search mode and type family history, you will see the system ones in italic are mapped, but the ones your clinic uses are not mapped. I am trying to figure out if we are supposed to map them or if this happens when CQR reporting is sent.

Posted : June 25, 2014 9:08 pm

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
1 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0