Maybe I missed something somewhere, but did everyone else do the data mapping in administration for all the FH observations or did you just do it in the forms? It was just discovered that this existed by my co-worker and now I am trying to figure out if I was supposed to do this as well as the form or just one or the other.....
I feel constantly confused with version 12.....
Thanks for any feedback!
We went through each and every CCCQE-User-Edit-FH-<specialty>-TFE.txt file and updated the SNOMED codes to make this form work. Then we decided to put the CPS11 FH-SH form back in place because the users were screaming at how difficult the CPS12 form was to use. So, as it sits today, we are using the old form with SNOMED-edited text files in place.
Wait, you were able to use the CPS 11 CCC file and add the snomed codes to that? I also thought that the MU2 report looked for the first degree relationship? The CPS 12 FH form is awful, and the worst workflow ever!!
The measure does state - data entry for one or more first degree relatives.
I would be interested in the data mapping if anyone has information.
Steph B.
As part of the CPS12 upgrade, the CCC text file for Family Medicine (Adult) got updated. I took the changes occurred in this file and transferred them to the other specialty specific FH-SH files. We did this as stop gap to get our providers to stop screaming. We will put the CPS12 FH-SH form back in place very soon because the MU criteria does state - for 1 or more first degree relatives.
The data mapping I am referring to is in the administration module, under codes-settings-data mapping. If you go under the search mode and type family history, you will see the system ones in italic are mapped, but the ones your clinic uses are not mapped. I am trying to figure out if we are supposed to map them or if this happens when CQR reporting is sent.