Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

How to accurately determine patients with a specific problem

General Discussion

Last Post by bruins1986 10 years ago

2 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

94 Views

RSS

joeg1962

(@joeg1962)

Posts: 843

Noble Member

Topic starter

Prior to the recent upgrades, in the problem list were the terms for HXof or FHof in addition to the DXof qualifier. Thus, when I queried or wrote a Crystal Report, I would always include the qualifier to only get the patients with the diagnosis.

Now, that concept is gone. So while I could continue using the DXof, I will not grab any diagnoses added after our upgrade. And, because we have thousands of patients we have not yet reviewed every patient chart to remove all the qualified problem, I am stuck.

So, does anyone have a work-around to handle this? The only thing I can think of is a toggle where pre-existing problems (to upgrade) based on the DB_CREATE_DATE use the DXof requirement while anything recent does not need the DXof.

Thanks.

~Joe

Posted : November 25, 2014 5:37 am

bruins1986

(@bruins1986)

Posts: 233

Reputable Member

Hi Joe,

In our system (so I assume across the board) these old problem qualifiers were pushed to the comments when a patient's problem list was updated in any fashion since the update to 9.8. Any patient that has not been viewed should still have the qualifier present. I haven't built a report to dig that deep yet but I imagine something like:

not(
problem.annotate like "*Hx of*", "*FH of*" //I do forget exactly how these translate from qualifiers to comments - it has been a while since we upgraded and noticed this//
or
problem.qualifier in "Hx of" etc
or
problem.description like "*Hx*", "*Family*", "*History*" //to capture those clever ones that updated the description of the problems when they noticed the qualifiers were gone//
)

Sorry I couldn't be of more help.

Mike

Posted : November 25, 2014 11:05 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
1 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0