Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Migration Considerations

General Discussion

Last Post by Mitch Kwiatkowski 12 years ago

2 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

99 Views

RSS

gfishback

(@gfishback)

Posts: 70

Estimable Member

Topic starter

We are currently on EMR 9.5 and are looking at going through a "Data Divorce" and then a Migration to CPS 10. We have 3 options

1. leave EMR "as is" in a read-only capacity and start charting fresh in CPS 10. A lot of hassle but we would lose 15 years of garbage. We already use CPS 10 for the PM side of the formula so it would impact EMR use only. Obviously painful on the front end but ultimately clean

2. Use someone like Lost Creek Consulting to assist in doing a summary migration losing the individual historic documents but having the structured data moved

3. Paying top dollar to GE to perform these feats for the migration of most data.

I would very much like to talk to anyone that has done any of these methods to hear your successes and frustrations.

Greg Fishback
Director of Information Technology for GreenField Health

[email protected]

Posted : July 25, 2012 8:49 am

Mitch Kwiatkowski

(@mitch)

Posts: 111

Estimable Member

We combined EMR 2005 and PM 2004 into CPS 9.5 a couple of years ago. We already had both, and that may differ from your situation if you don't. We used GE and had a great experience. We went through two test migrations to try to identify as many issues as possible, and we were fortunate to have solid resources available to troubleshoot when things went wrong. All of our data was migrated.

I can't compare to what other companies can offer, but I would definitely recommend the GE path. If nothing else, keeping the data makes the cost worthwhile.

Posted : July 25, 2012 11:46 pm

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0