Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Performance help

General Discussion

Last Post by tnc 11 years ago

6 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

55 Views

RSS

tnc

(@tnc)

Posts: 517

Honorable Member

Topic starter

Does anyone have any input on performance tweaks? My main complaint that I hear is when users are in a patient chart and then "go back to the desktop". I can see that myself when I watch them but I have no idea what is going on behind the scenes and how I would improve that process.

I can guess:

1. Maybe data needs to be pulled from the db to populate the desktop?

2. Maybe the ERX server is being queried and that server is slower (it is in my case)

3. Maybe the Jboss server needs more HP or memory (I don't think it does in my case)

My setup:

1. I had the network blessed by a network guru yesterday. Gigabit thick/fat clients, new workstations. My iperf testing shows 700-900 mbit consistently, Cisco 3560G switching, 4GB etherchannel between each switch

2. Recently upgraded to a Dell chassis/blade setup, VMWare 5.1, 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz GB blades, 96 GB RAM (Jboss and SQL on separate blades)

3. Network cabling is either fiber or CAT5e certified, tested and professionally installed

4. Workstations are Core2 Duo Core i5 and core i7 processors, 6GB RAM, Windows 7 x 64

Running CQIC as the CCC type content which I have heard in the past that CCC slows things down. We are a tad behind in the version but that will be fixed soon. I do not hold out hope that the CQIC is the problem though.

We are on CPS 10.1.3.300 ( I know there is a newer version but we have to shut down the clinic and sneaker-net the client installs due to lack of MSI support)

Servers are Windows 2008R2 per GE recommendations, up to date with windows updates on servers and workstations.

I think I can rule out infrastructure since I see a performance problem at one specific place in CPS.

Any input is greatly appreciated

Mike Zavolas

Tallahassee Neurological Clinic

Posted : August 6, 2013 3:27 am

abulsara

(@abulsara)

Posts: 150

Estimable Member

Mike,

What is the specs of your JBOSS server? When a user goes from Chart to Desktop, several jboss calls are made to make up the desktop components. If the JBOSS is not able to process those requests quick enough, users will see the spinning wheels of "Loading". The other thing to consider is daily reboot of jboss. Currently, we reboot twice a week and it has helped in performance.

-Amar

Posted : August 17, 2013 8:36 am

tnc

(@tnc)

Posts: 517

Honorable Member

Topic starter

abulsara said:

Mike,

What is the specs of your JBOSS server? When a user goes from Chart to Desktop, several jboss calls are made to make up the desktop components. If the JBOSS is not able to process those requests quick enough, users will see the spinning wheels of "Loading". The other thing to consider is daily reboot of jboss. Currently, we reboot twice a week and it has helped in performance.

-Amar

Hay Amar, thanks for responding.

Running VMWare 5.1 vCenter, patches current as of two weeks ago

2 X 8 core CPUs allocated (E5-2660 @ 2.2ghz)

24 GB RAM

Storage is FC connected @ 4gbit, EMC Clariion SAN

rebooted daily @ 4:30am

I recently migrated to a Dell chassis with the blade servers listed above, previous hardware was recommeded GE as "the fix" but we have always had issues when users move from the chart to the desktop. I don't think it is the spinning loading thing as much as it is a delay with an hourglass.

previous hardware: X3450 @ 2.67Ghx Xeon (dual processor, 8 core). I am surprised nobody is admitting at least a minimal increase in performance but maybe it is no improvement at all. I should feel lucky that they aren't saying it is worse 🙂

Interesting comment from a doctor over the weekend. He couldn't get in to his desktop from home so I had him hit a VM instead. He said it was faster when going to desktop from chart. The only difference is the number of switch hops from his usual workstation and the server. He mentioned that he is comparing a usual Saturday to this Saturday so it is not because of less people in the system.

Mike

Posted : August 19, 2013 12:37 am

tnc

(@tnc)

Posts: 517

Honorable Member

Topic starter

tnc said:

abulsara said:

Mike,

What is the specs of your JBOSS server? When a user goes from Chart to Desktop, several jboss calls are made to make up the desktop components. If the JBOSS is not able to process those requests quick enough, users will see the spinning wheels of "Loading". The other thing to consider is daily reboot of jboss. Currently, we reboot twice a week and it has helped in performance.

-Amar

Hay Amar, thanks for responding.

Running VMWare 5.1 vCenter, patches current as of two weeks ago

2 X 8 core CPUs allocated (E5-2660 @ 2.2ghz)

24 GB RAM

Storage is FC connected @ 4gbit, EMC Clariion SAN

rebooted daily @ 4:30am

I recently migrated to a Dell chassis with the blade servers listed above, previous hardware was recommeded GE as "the fix" but we have always had issues when users move from the chart to the desktop. I don't think it is the spinning loading thing as much as it is a delay with an hourglass.

previous hardware: X3450 @ 2.67Ghx Xeon (dual processor, 8 core). I am surprised nobody is admitting at least a minimal increase in performance but maybe it is no improvement at all. I should feel lucky that they aren't saying it is worse 🙂

Interesting comment from a doctor over the weekend. He couldn't get in to his desktop from home so I had him hit a VM instead. He said it was faster when going to desktop from chart. The only difference is the number of switch hops from his usual workstation and the server. He mentioned that he is comparing a usual Saturday to this Saturday so it is not because of less people in the system.

Mike

Well, just an update here. It looks like a "global refresh bug" which GE engineers are currently working on a fix for. I would expect this bug to be present in CPS 11 too.

Still working on this with GE Support

Posted : October 2, 2013 4:24 am

abulsara

(@abulsara)

Posts: 150

Estimable Member

We are skipping CPS 11.

Posted : October 2, 2013 12:50 pm

tnc

(@tnc)

Posts: 517

Honorable Member

Topic starter

abulsara said:

We are skipping CPS 11.

I wish we could do that.

Posted : October 7, 2013 3:51 am

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed