Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Requesting input about PMH/FH/SH utilization

General Discussion

Last Post by Steven King, MBA, MEd 13 years ago

7 Posts

4 Users

0 Reactions

60 Views

RSS

Steven King, MBA, MEd

(@st322536)

Posts: 13

Eminent Member

Topic starter

By way of introduction, I work with Health First Physicians in Melbourne, FL.

Recently, our Medical Director posed a question about standard practice for Centricity users.

What components are generally accepted for inclusion with the following templates:

Past Medical History
Family History
Social History

I am particularly interested in components included where Centricity users have opted to create their own versions of these categories.

Kindly,

Steve King, MBA, MEd

[email protected]

Posted : April 4, 2012 5:02 am

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

If I understand what you are asking, we seem to different opinions about this among our 45 physicians. The majority feel that past medical history is problems that are not currently active. We have developed our own forms and collect the family history and social history that each specialty wants.

Posted : April 12, 2012 3:03 am

Steven King, MBA, MEd

(@st322536)

Posts: 13

Eminent Member

Topic starter

mbellis said:

If I understand what you are asking, we seem to different opinions about this among our 45 physicians. The majority feel that past medical history is problems that are not currently active. We have developed our own forms and collect the family history and social history that each specialty wants.

Hello,

Yes, this is helpful. My Medical Director has been trying to ascertain current ideology.

Thank you.

Posted : April 15, 2012 11:08 pm

Anonymous

(@Anonymous)

Posts: 0

New Member Guest

Agree completely that Past Medical History is best used for historic information "a narrative" of the patient's history. I do not believe that it should be used to simply list active problems. There are much better places (e.g. the problem list) to document active issues and their assessments and plans.

The best approach I've seen is to use PMH as a place to collect historic details like "Cardiac cath done at the VA in 2003 showed 3 vessel disease so PCTA done by Dr XYZ". Such a narrative will be correct and useful over time. It is best not to include time sensitive information like future plans and short term issues because these might be incorrect the next time the patient is seen.

Good to set up this understanding in advance because there is a common misunderstanding about the intention of PMH. Remember, we providers are all conditioned from dictating admission H&P's during residency training. Those traditionally start with HPI (current issue) and PMH (patient's problem list) so it is understandable why providers equate the PMH with the active problem list. In the EMR this element of an H&P is done using both the Active Problem List and the PMH. Then you've covered all the bases.

Sue

Susan Thomas MD FAAFP

[email protected] | http://www.susanthomasmd.com

Posted : April 16, 2012 3:52 am

Steven King, MBA, MEd

(@st322536)

Posts: 13

Eminent Member

Topic starter

DrSue said:

Agree completely that Past Medical History is best used for historic information "a narrative" of the patient's history. I do not believe that it should be used to simply list active problems. There are much better places (e.g. the problem list) to document active issues and their assessments and plans.

The best approach I've seen is to use PMH as a place to collect historic details like "Cardiac cath done at the VA in 2003 showed 3 vessel disease so PCTA done by Dr XYZ". Such a narrative will be correct and useful over time. It is best not to include time sensitive information like future plans and short term issues because these might be incorrect the next time the patient is seen.

Good to set up this understanding in advance because there is a common misunderstanding about the intention of PMH. Remember, we providers are all conditioned from dictating admission H&P's during residency training. Those traditionally start with HPI (current issue) and PMH (patient's problem list) so it is understandable why providers equate the PMH with the active problem list. In the EMR this element of an H&P is done using both the Active Problem List and the PMH. Then you've covered all the bases.

Sue

Susan Thomas MD FAAFP

[email protected] | http://www.susanthomasmd.com

Dr. Thomas,

Thank you for a very thorough answer to my query.

Posted : April 16, 2012 4:10 am

eliasp

(@eliasp)

Posts: 18

Eminent Member

I agree with what I think are Sue's main points (she and I have discussed this more than once, right Sue?):

The problem list is more like an index of current and past problems. It can provide an overview. It is also composed of tagged data and therefore lends itself better to automated data processes like point of care decision support, generation of letters or reports, audits.
The PMHx is more like the story of the patient's medical journey. It can be nicely granular and can give a much more useful picture than an index or list.

There are some caveats:

As she says, it is essential that all the users be on the same page about how to use this. People do not like having their carefully crafted narrative nuked by a copy-paste or quick-text list.
It requires doing some work twice. It is pretty common to have significant differences between the two sources of information, with some problems appearing in only one of the two places. This means clinicians potentially need to enter information twice, in two places, and review information twice, in two places, to make sure they are not missing something.
Almost everything generated for letters and reports comes off the Problem List, not out of PMHx. This means that what many of us use for transmission of information during transitions does NOT include the more detailed and useful information in the PMHx.

Peter

Posted : April 16, 2012 5:16 am

Steven King, MBA, MEd

(@st322536)

Posts: 13

Eminent Member

Topic starter

eliasp said:

There are some caveats:

As she says, it is essential that all the users be on the same page about how to use this. People do not like having their carefully crafted narrative nuked by a copy-paste or quick-text list.

It requires doing some work twice. It is pretty common to have significant differences between the two sources of information, with some problems appearing in only one of the two places. This means clinicians potentially need to enter information twice, in two places, and review information twice, in two places, to make sure they are not missing something.

Almost everything generated for letters and reports comes off the Problem List, not out of PMHx. This means that what many of us use for transmission of information during transitions does NOT include the more detailed and useful information in the PMHx.

Dr. Elias,

Thank you for your additional insight. I am married to a provider who shares the frustration that duplicity of effort seems unavoidable. It is a good point that culled information arises from the Problem List and not out of the PMHx - thereby effectively eliminating that information in transition.

Posted : April 16, 2012 5:23 am

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed