Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Sending CCDA Electronically

General Discussion

Last Post by bruins1986 9 years ago

5 Posts

4 Users

0 Reactions

58 Views

RSS

bwebb

(@bwebb)

Posts: 40

Trusted Member

Topic starter

Is anyone having trouble with this measure? If the referring providers do not have electronica addresses to send to how can a Primary Care Provider meet the 10% threshold if there are not enough providers to send to?

Posted : October 9, 2015 5:35 am

tcross

(@tcross)

Posts: 165

Estimable Member

It is difficult with very few providers having a secure address. We do use ACM-Providers to assist and get credit for both secure messaging and faxing through the system. You may want to check with Surescripts if you are intrested.

Posted : October 9, 2015 5:43 am

bruins1986

(@bruins1986)

Posts: 233

Reputable Member

Unfortunately CMS addressed this obvious and real issue with what amounts to "go screw". From page 188 of the federal register:

“We appreciate the commenters' concern about a lack of participation by EPs to whom the referrals are made and note that this is one reason behind the relatively low 10 percent threshold for this measure”

Thanks CMS!

Posted : October 9, 2015 5:55 am

mikeseale

(@mikeseale)

Posts: 344

Reputable Member

I have a discussion on GE Community board about this very topic. 3 of our 50+ service providers are attesting for meaningful use this year, so we are lucky to get 5% on this measure.

I'm probably just going to create a dummy secure email account for each service provider we send data to and link them to it until they are able to sign up with a HISP. We will still have to fax over like we are usually doing, but at least we are showing that we have the ability to send these documents electronically.

Posted : October 9, 2015 7:15 am

bruins1986

(@bruins1986)

Posts: 233

Reputable Member

Mike be careful, from page 191:

"we note that to count in the numerator the sending provider must reasonable certainty of receipt of the summary of care document”

Posted : October 9, 2015 8:20 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
1 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0