Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

still concerned about losing structured CPT Code information

General Discussion

Last Post by petemarkey 9 years ago

1 Posts

1 Users

0 Reactions

58 Views

RSS

petemarkey

(@petemarkey)

Posts: 373

Honorable Member

Topic starter

So I am still concerned about not being able to store S/P CPT Code information in the problem list. Since day 1 (1998) we have done this and it has worked well.

Sure I can go to CCC PSH form and free text anything in there, but then how do reference that in Protocols, etc....

Should I go in and convert everyone's problem list that has had an appendectomy and remove S/P Appendectomy CPT-44950 and replace it with (ICD-V45.72) (ICD10-Z90.49) : Acquired absence of other specified parts of digestive tract?

The GE "mapping" did not do that....... so know we have CPT codes, but can't add any more, so we have historical data that is not going to match future data.

Can someone explain what the difference in having the S/P with a CPT code in the problem list vs. having an ICD10 code, pros/cons? Why do they even have procedures in the ICD10 Code set?

Not a coding guy, just a tech guy, but this one keeps bugging me.

having everything in the problem list was very convenient way for the doctor to get a quick total view of the patient, including family history.

Now family history as well is just blobs of text if using CCC FH. I really don't know what this form is doing.... it doesn't say it is writing observation terms....

HOW WOULD I REFERENCE THIS FH In protocols, reports, etc???

This really doesn't have to do with billing but directly to patient care.

Posted : October 4, 2015 3:49 pm

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0