Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

CQR

Page 2 / 2 Prev

MU, CQR, PQRS, etc.

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

19 Posts

15 Users

0 Reactions

173 Views

RSS

akoen

(@akoen)

Posts: 144

Estimable Member

It seems I might be a little out numbered in this group, but I wanted to post a positive note. We have been on CQR for over a year now and have had MINIMAL PROBLEMS - as a matter of fact, we successfully attested using CQR last year and plan to do it this year as well. Our data is appearing as we expect, and we are very happy with the results.

I will say our level of success has not been without work. Once the MU Guide was released, and every time the guide is updated, I review each measure to ensure our system is set up as the guide states. That being said, the guide is not always perfect, but in those rare instances, a simple call to GE has remedied the issue.

In my opinion, GE has done a great job with CQR. Compared to the crystal reports, the CQR dashboard is much easier to read. I like that all information for 1 physician is available at a glance rather than running a different report for each measure.

I am happy to answer any questions about our setup. I don't see the need to move to a 3rd party when GE has already engineered a product that works.

Amanda Koenig

Oregon Orthopedic

[email protected]

Posted : August 25, 2015 6:29 am

twerner

(@twerner)

Posts: 82

Estimable Member

Amanda - thank you for sharing your positive experience with CQR and GE.

Terri Werner Brown
Southwest Gastroenterology Associates

Posted : August 25, 2015 7:29 am

joeg1962

(@joeg1962)

Posts: 843

Noble Member

Perhaps GE will consider putting on a series of webinars on how to effectively use the CQR - since many (all ?) of the users are struggling to understand how to configure the Data Mapping, etc..

One other thought - when clicking on a measure to see who meets or does-not-meet, why does this NOT include the patient MRN? The first column Patient ID does not seem to equal the Patient ID in the system, so difficult to match the data back up.

Posted : September 3, 2015 2:28 am

burnsh

(@burnsh)

Posts: 155

Estimable Member

I knew I had read this list of posting - just wondering if any are any new answers since the final rule from CMS. Thanks,

Posted : October 16, 2015 2:13 am

Page 2 / 2 Prev

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0