Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Issues CPS 12. MU - Clinical Visit summary Crystal Report. GE Report is Completely wrong

MU, CQR, PQRS, etc.

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

5 Posts

3 Users

0 Reactions

81 Views

RSS

Anonymous

(@Anonymous)

Posts: 0

New Member Guest

Topic starter

i had been having issue with this report since day one.

but this is not the worst case. the worst case is that after having wrong value been displayed by this report i decided to get some of this work into my own hands and decided to built my own report.

after running a few queries with SQL before placing the query in crystal report is when my the worst hit me.

i have a few physician which the report shows them with more than 400 denominator and about 300+ enumerators.

After running the query for this physician i realized that they had been doing the MU clinical visit summary workflow 1 all wrong since day one.

They don't have a single Clinical visit summary on any chart, neither the workflow 1 or workflow 2.

Also i realized that what was being counted as enumerator

Posted : December 15, 2014 12:18 pm

JenWagaman

(@jenwagaman)

Posts: 74

Trusted Member

What was being counted as the numerator?

Posted : December 16, 2014 4:10 am

Anonymous

(@Anonymous)

Posts: 0

New Member Guest

Topic starter

Some other random handout

Posted : December 16, 2014 4:25 am

Palko

(@palko)

Posts: 132

Estimable Member

We are having the same issue with the CVS. When you say "they" have been doing the CVS wrong do you mean GE? Thanks.

Posted : December 29, 2014 4:27 am

Anonymous

(@Anonymous)

Posts: 0

New Member Guest

Topic starter

no, one of our physician.

which is ok since, she is a specialist which won't be attesting.

but the problem is the "why is she coming in this report when is obvious, that has not being performing the workflow."

Posted : December 29, 2014 5:10 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
6 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0