Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Meaningful Use & the Flexibility Rule

MU, CQR, PQRS, etc.

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

5 Posts

5 Users

0 Reactions

99 Views

RSS

kmarsh

(@kmarsh)

Posts: 85

Estimable Member

Topic starter

Is anyone is willing to share their documentation for defending attesting to flexibility rule?
Thanks

Posted : January 16, 2015 9:06 am

jcollins

(@jcollins)

Posts: 107

Estimable Member

K,

I would really like to hear more about what everyone is thinking on this subject.

We are a 2 physician practice. We have done MU 1 two times.

We are looking to attest to MU 1 a third time via the flexibility rule (MU 1 year 2 plus).

We were on CPS 10 until DEC 10th 2014. now CPS 12 sp 7.

Any comments are welcome.

Jack Collins MD

Posted : January 18, 2015 2:36 pm

sborchardt

(@sborchardt)

Posts: 218

Reputable Member

We have kept all of the e-mails sent by GE about the v 12 and CQR. We have kept all e-mails that have SPR #'s related to 12 and CQR. We believe these thing would qualify because the delay is related to software development, certification, implementation, testing, or the release of the product by the EHR vendor.

Good luck,

Steph B.

Posted : January 19, 2015 5:49 am

bruins1986

(@bruins1986)

Posts: 233

Reputable Member

Hi all,

We are doing the same as Steph. I have also kept track of all of the back and forth related to troubleshooting the necessary workflows (chief among them the electronic TOC and all the hurdles we had with the Mass Hiway). We are assuming that tracking the actual vendor/CQR downtimes/issues as well as our continued efforts to "get live" in a timely fashion should suffice. I've also taken the time to write up a synopsis about our troubles and efforts for my MU stage 2 related projects (not sure if that is going to matter but it was necessary to keep my team up to speed anyway).

Thanks,
Mike

Posted : January 26, 2015 7:16 am

DavidShower

(@davidshower)

Posts: 1255

Noble Member

Moved to the Healthcare Reform forum

Posted : January 26, 2015 9:26 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0