Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Menu Measure #3 Imaging Results

MU, CQR, PQRS, etc.

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

9 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

73 Views

RSS

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

For those who will do Menu Measure 3 for Stage 2, how are you planning on implementing this? We have a PACS system, and I was wondering if we could use the new ribbon bar to include a link to the PACS and coordinate the log in so it could open directly. I am not sure how you would get it to open directly to the patient's images though? Any ideas or thoughts on this measure?

Posted : May 14, 2014 1:57 am

ekappes

(@ekappes)

Posts: 87

Estimable Member

In our case, we do it with a link to the accession number. The link looks something like this: https://mc-pacs.mayfieldneuro.com/loadStudy.jsp?user_name=AnonymousUser&password=&rsa=true&accession_number=1.2.392.200036.9125.2.186347155103.64743637045.1508101. This method works, though, if your images open in a browser. If you have another type of PACS viewer, I'm not sure how it would work.

What bothers me about what GE has done for this measure is that the PACS link has to be attached to a document type of Imaging Report, when it's not a report we're attaching--it's a link to an imaging study. We currently have the actual reports attached to Imaging Report documents and links attached to the PACS Link document type.

Posted : May 15, 2014 10:23 pm

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

Thanks for the response! That gives us a direction to move in! Do you have the link at the bottom of each imaging report? If not, is there a reason that this can't be done?

Posted : May 15, 2014 10:33 pm

ekappes

(@ekappes)

Posts: 87

Estimable Member

I suppose it could be done that way if you're creating them manually. Our PACS system automatically sends an HL7 message to LinkLogic and the links are generated that way. Our reports are received separately and therefore are separate documents from the links.

Posted : May 15, 2014 10:37 pm

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

I see. So there are 2 separate documents for the image. Are you on CPS 12? Are the reports picking this up for MU? If that's the case, then this seems like the path of least resistance.

Posted : May 15, 2014 10:43 pm

ekappes

(@ekappes)

Posts: 87

Estimable Member

We're on EMR 9.5 and moving to EMR 9.8 at the end of the month. The GE MU report will pick up our links as long as they are called Imaging Report. What we currently call Imaging Report (the real report, not the link) would not be picked up because they typically come in via a local hospital or imaging center interface. The only time there would be an attachment (which is what GE is looking for) would be if the patient is from outside outside our region and the report is scanned in. I guess we'll change the name of those to Imaging Report-Actual or something like that.

Posted : May 15, 2014 10:53 pm

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

We were just talking, and since our Rads dictate the imaging report, we are thinking we would have our transcriptionists insert the link in the imaging report since the process is manual anyways. (sorry for the long run on sentence!) I wonder if this would work or be a feasible work flow..

Posted : May 15, 2014 10:57 pm

ekappes

(@ekappes)

Posts: 87

Estimable Member

That sounds like a good plan, except that the link could not be in the report itself since GE is looking for an attachment. After typing the report, the transcriptionist would need to need to highlight the document, click on Attach..Add Attachment..Ext. Ref., and put the link in there.

Posted : May 15, 2014 11:06 pm

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

Ah, ok! Thank you so much for your advice and help!

Posted : May 15, 2014 11:08 pm

Share:

24 Forums
9,942 Topics
39.9 K Posts
0 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0