Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

MEL_ADD_ORDER and Order Sets

MEL, SQL, Oracle

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

4 Posts

4 Users

0 Reactions

56 Views

RSS

jkratzer

(@jkratzer)

Posts: 138

Estimable Member

Topic starter

1. Can a defined “Order Set” name be placed in the DESCRIPTION argument of the function, MEL_ADD_ORDER?

2. If so, will it store and print each order in the order set?

3. If it prints, is it one order per page, or all orders of the order set on one page?

Posted : June 27, 2016 5:37 am

DavidShower

(@davidshower)

Posts: 1255

Noble Member

I don't believe they could because Order Sets are not any one Type or Category, and those are required parameters.

Posted : June 27, 2016 6:10 am

bhoover

(@bhoover)

Posts: 360

Honorable Member

You can write a function to call a bunch of MEL_ADD_ORDERS to get the same effect. However for the reason David explained above it is a bit of reinventing the wheel. It depends on how badly you want to do it. In this circumstance each of the orders would print individually. You could do something like this in a button:

{fnorderset("Chem-6")}

Then have a function like this:

fn fnorderset(setName)

{

COND

CASE setName == "Chem-6"

//each of the MEL_ADD_ORDER statements go here

CASE setName == "Diabetic"

//next group goes here, and so on

ENDCOND

}

This is just off the top of my head. Hope it helps.

Brad

Posted : June 27, 2016 7:02 am

Lee

(@lee-cooper)

Posts: 348

Reputable Member

Using arrays, it is possible to do what you want, however it requires that the order information be stored in the code (hard coded), which is not always the better approach. Conversely, you could create a custom order list that holds only the individual orders in the order set, but that can really over populate your order custom list name list. To combat this, some have used a naming convention such as 'zOS_OrderSetName'. The 'z' pushes the name to the bottom of the list, the 'OS_' signifies that the contents pertain to an order set, and the 'OrderSetName' is the unique name you give to the order set.

Then using Custom Lists as the data source, you can loop through, identify and call the order set lists, and accomplish what you want. Note - it will print each order individually based on order type and service provider link.

Posted : June 27, 2016 7:21 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,940 Topics
39.9 K Posts
1 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0