Welcome to the NEW CHUG— your ultimate destination for cutting-edge insights and discussions at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Our platform is dedicated to exploring the dynamic landscape of healthcare technology, empowering professionals, enthusiasts, and innovators alike with the knowledge and resources to navigate the rapidly evolving field.

From telemedicine revolutionizing patient care to the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in diagnostics, we delve into a myriad of topics shaping the future of healthcare delivery. Whether you’re a seasoned healthcare IT professional, an aspiring entrepreneur in the digital health space, or simply curious about the latest innovations, our curated content, expert interviews, and thought-provoking articles provide a comprehensive exploration of healthcare technology’s most pressing issues.

Join us as we navigate the forefront of innovation, driving forward the transformation of healthcare for a healthier, more connected world.

Have questions or suggestions? Please use the contact button below.

Notifications

Clear all

Anyone using the SM Lab Results letter that came with Kryptiq's portal?

Patient Self Service

Last Post by Anonymous 1 second ago

4 Posts

2 Users

0 Reactions

87 Views

RSS

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

I am wondering if anyone is using the SM lab results letter created by Kryptiq that comes with the portal. We are very diligent about not releasing our staff's full names to patients and while I can adjust the letter to sign a first name only, when you sign the document off, it signs with the user's first and last name (like all chart documents). My issue is, this then gets sent as part of the secure message or letter. I'm curious if anyone has found a way around this? Also, as a side note, the letter option looks more like a document than a letter, or at least it just looks weird to me. I am wondering if anyone happened to modify that as well?

Posted : January 29, 2013 12:03 am

sborchardt

(@sborchardt)

Posts: 218

Reputable Member

Good morning Malissa, I am wondering how this is working for your clinic? We are using the ACM to send the CVS, but want to start using it for lab results as well. Can you give any advice on the pros and cons your clinic as come across?

Thanks,

Steph

Posted : June 6, 2013 11:41 pm

mbellis

(@mbellis)

Posts: 293

Reputable Member

Topic starter

We changed the coding to sign the message/letter with only the first name which has worked ok for the nurses who use it. However, we have one physician who uses it and it drives her crazy that signs her first name only. We don't have a wide use of this particular form due to all the particular issues with the names. I am currently investigating using the ACM to send normal labs via the portal. It would relieve the nurses of a lot of work, and since the ACM functions so smoothly I would really like to try this in the near future.

Posted : June 6, 2013 11:48 pm

sborchardt

(@sborchardt)

Posts: 218

Reputable Member

We are looking to use the ACM to send the normals automatically after they are signed. Is anyone currently using this function? I am looking for good and bad feedback. Also how do you work the abnormal labs?

Is anyone using the Liaison/Ignis format? I watch a webinar on this yesterday as usual Ignis is ahead of the game but we are already paying for the ACM and want to try and make it work.

Thanks Smile

Posted : June 7, 2013 12:13 am

Share:

24 Forums
9,942 Topics
39.9 K Posts
1 Online
6,470 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

Powered by wpForo Powered by wpForo version 2.4.0